If you urgently need to replace your heating system, contact Energy Freedom Homes today; we'll get you the best system for your circumstances and requirements as quickly as possible. Click here to contact us. On your journey to an Energy Freedom Home, you have reached the stage where you are ready to replace your gas heating, or perhaps you are just finding out what is involved so you can be prepared when it's time to make the switch.
Unsure about what an Energy Freedom Home is? You can read about it
here.
Replacing your gas heating is a great opportunity to lower your energy bills, as space heating accounts for the biggest proportion of energy use.
Source1
Upgrading to a more efficient system can save you a lot of money...but how should you go about doing it? Luckily, despite what you may have heard, it's really not that complicated.
In the following collection of articles we will take you through:
- The decisions that need to be made to get to all-electric heating;
- Which heating system to buy based on your requirements.
In this article, we cover the decisions.
Key decisions
We will take you though the key decisions that may be blocking you from taking action.
A summary of these is below. We've also outlined the decisions that we'd recommend for most people.
Decision
| Options
| Recommended
|
When to buy
| Now / later
| Now
|
Energy source
| Electric resistive / heat pump / wood
| Heat pump
|
Heating source
| Portable heater / split system / ducted / hydronic / underfloor / stove
| Split system
|
First decision: when to buy?
There are three areas to consider when deciding the time to upgrade:
- If your current system is beyond its life span;
- If your current system is out of warranty;
- If you bought your system more than three years ago.
Life span
Many of us wait until our current appliances die before we replace them. The problem with waiting for your heating system to die is that you will need to make decisions quickly and you will be selecting from what is available, rather than what would suit your circumstance best.
The average life span for a gas system is pretty variable, but if your system is over ten years it is definitely past its prime. So, if you have a system that is older than ten years, it is worth considering an upgrade before you are making an emergency call to your local plumber!
Out of warranty
As soon as your system is out of warranty you are vulnerable to paying for a replacement should anything go wrong. Rather than having the unexpected cost of replacing an out-of-warranty product, you can budget for the replacement now.
Take advantage of rebates
There are government rebates available to install efficient heating systems. As a Victorian, you are eligible for different levels of rebate depending on your current heating system and what you want to replace it with.
These rebates do change reasonably regularly, so reach out to Energy Freedom Homes
here, if you are interested in what is currently available.
We don't know how long these rebates will be around for, so deciding to upgrade now is better than waiting and missing out.
Each of these options mean the best time to buy is now. You'll benefit from lower running costs straight away and government rebates will probably only reduce over time.
Second decision: Energy source
What will you choose to replace gas as a new energy source? Below we outline the pros and cons for each option and then relate these to your requirements.
Electric resistive
Electric resistive heat sources work by using electricity to heat a metal element to red-hot. The heat energy from the element is then transferred to air via convection, or another medium like oil or water to generate radiant heat.
Pros
- Products with this technology are usually cheaper to buy.
- Doesn't emit any harmful gases or combustion by-products.
Cons
- Relatively inefficient, leading to high ongoing running costs.
Heat pumps
Heat pumps extract thermal energy from the air. The energy is transferred via a very cold refrigerant that is moved through a compressor. In the case of a heating system, the heat energy from the compressed refrigerant is then transferred via convection from a coil into air or water for hydronic heating.
Pros
- Because the refrigerant is so cold, heat pumps can extract heat from the air down all the way down to sub-zero temperatures.
- Heat pumps can extract about 3 units of heat energy from the air for every unit of energy put in from electricity. This makes the running costs for a heat pump very low compared to other technologies.
- Doesn't emit any harmful gases or combustion by-products.
- Heat pumps are able to heat, cool and dehumidify your home using the same product. These type of units are called "reverse cycle".
Cons
- Up-front purchase cost is generally higher than for other energy sources.
- Not a good source of energy for hydronic heating applications.
Wood
Wood stoves or fireplaces generate radiant heat by burning stuff. A range of different fuels exist, from normal firewood to solid-state fuels with higher efficiency and lower emissions.
Pros
- Depending on the product, can be a lower up-front cost.
- Depending on availability of wood, fuel sources can be cheap or even free which makes ongoing running costs low.
Cons
- Generates significant emissions and air pollution from burning fuel, especially standard woods.
- 'Of all heat production sources, small-scale domestic wood ... burning is the most severe polluter' and causes 'the highest health costs'2:
- One kilogram of wood will pollute one million cubic metres of completely clean air3.
- Wood fire stoves are a major contributor to tiny particle pollution, which is a pollution that is proven to damage health and cause early deaths2 3.
Energy Freedom Homes does not recommend the use of wood as an energy source.
Which is the best option for your requirements?
Requirement/scenario
| Electric resistive
| Heat pump
| Wood
|
Purchasing budget
| Low
| Medium - High
| Low - Medium
|
Doesn't affect indoor air quality
| ✅
| ✅
|
|
Low running costs
|
| ✅
| ✅*
|
Low environmental impact
| ✅
| ✅
|
|
*Only if the wood is sourced for free. Quality wood can be expensive.
Third decision: heating source
The final decision is the heating source. We'll look at the different ways the energy source can be harnessed to heat your home. As before, we'll outline the pros and cons for each option and then relate these to your requirements.
Portable heaters
These products fall broadly into two categories, both of which use an electric resistive energy source.
Some heaters use convection through heating an element with electricity which than passes the heat energy directly to the surrounding air, usually assisted by a fan. Examples of this are radiant, ceramic and panel heaters. The other type uses an electrical element to heat a liquid, which then radiates heat out into the space. Oil heaters are an example of this.
Irrespective of the type of heater, portable heaters have the same pros and cons as a heating solution.
Pros
- Usually portable.
- Cheaper to buy.
- Effectively heats small spaces for a short period of time.
- No electrical upgrades required; can plug into a standard power point.
- Don't emit any harmful gases or combustion by-products.
Cons
- High running costs.
- Very inefficient if you want to heat large spaces or heat for long periods.
- Portable heaters use a lot of current and as such, having two could be enough to trip your mains switch.
- Some models are unsafe and can be a fire hazard.
- 43% of home heating-related fires and 85% of associated deaths are caused by portable heaters4.
- The system only provides heating. You'll need a different dedicated system for cooling during summer.
Summary: Portable heaters are not an effective whole house heating option.
This option can be good if you have a really tight budget. But use with caution.
Split systems
This heating source uses heat pumps as an energy source. They allow for a "zoning" approach to heating a home, where you put a different unit in each space that you want to heat.
Systems are composed of two units connected by insulated pipework; an indoor unit that blows hot (or cold) air and an outdoor unit that takes energy from the ambient air.
Pros
- Very effective for heating individual rooms and large spaces such as an open-plan living area.
- Much more economical than trying to heat the same space with portable electric heaters, because for every unit of electricity they consume, they can put out three or more units of heat, due to the heat pump technology they use.
- A split system will heat, cool and dehumidify your home using the same product.
- Easy-to-clean filters to maintain high efficiency and air quality.
- Less costly to install than ducted, underfloor or hydronic systems.
- A good option for retrofitting a heating system.
- A range of indoor units can accommodate installation locations from floor to ceiling.
- Air conditioners have a fast response time if required, but are more energy efficient if given time to slowly change room temperature.
Cons
- More expensive to buy than a portable electric heater.
- Requires professional installation.
- If you want best performance and air quality, annual servicing is recommended which will be an ongoing cost.
If you are short on space outdoors, it is possible to connect multiple indoor units to a single outdoor unit. This is called a "multi-head" system.
Summary: this is the most effective option for most people.
Ducted
This type of system is essentially uses the same technology and products as split systems, but instead of individual units spread out around the home the hot or cold air is generated in a central location and moved around the home to vents via insulated duct work.
Pros
- Vents in each room can look nicer than wall-mounted split system units.
- Where wall space is limited, installing duct work and vents is a viable alternative to split systems.
- If you have roof space for a central unit, this can be a good option.
- Can provide heating and cooling
- Air conditioners have a fast response time if required, but are more energy efficient if given time to slowly change room temperature.
Cons
- Designed to heat the entire home at once. If you want to break up the system into zones it will increase cost every time an additional zone is added. If you don't zone, you'll be spending money on energy to heat and cool rooms with no-one in them.
- More expensive to purchase and install than split systems.
- Even thought the duct work is well-insulated there will still be losses as the air is moved around the home, which makes it less efficient than a split system solution.
If you've got gas ducted heating, unfortunately it is not possible to reuse the ducts. They are not rated for heating and cooling, one of the major benefits of a reverse-cycle air conditioning system.
Summary: This option is good if you're happy to spend more money, or you don't have the wall space for indoor split system units.
Hydronic
Hydronic systems are much loved by those who have experienced them. This type of system is very popular in Europe and places with cold climates.
Hydronic heating works through heating water (or steam), piping it through the house into panel radiators and returning the water back to the heating system to be reheated for the cycle to repeat. You can also utilise this method to provide heating to in-floor systems.
Pros
- The radiant heat produced by hydronic systems is well-loved and may have a lower impact on people with allergies and asthma than convection heating alternatives.
- Heat output in each room can be controlled by adjustable radiator panels.
- Ongoing maintenance is low.
Cons
- Hydronic systems work best with very energy intensive energy sources like gas boilers. Even though electric boiler solutions exist, they either operate outside a heat pump's range of efficiency or consume a lot of power if using an electric resistance energy source.
- The amount of energy required to circulate water around the system and maintain temperate at a consistent level makes for high running costs.
- The system only provides heating. You'll need a different dedicated system for cooling during summer.
- The cost of an electric boiler and compatible pipework and panels make this a very expensive option.
If you've got hydronic heating, unfortunately it's not likely you'll be able to replace your gas boiler with a heat pump and keep your existing pipes and radiator panels. We've got a dedicated article explaining more
here.
Summary: Hydronic heating is only an option if you love the experience of radiant heating that you're happy to pay a lot for the privilege.
Underfloor
For this type of heating, electric wiring or water pipes are installed into a concrete floor slab. The slab is heated, using electricity or hot water (using hydronic technology for water). It then releases the stored heat during the day, in a similar way to an off-peak storage heater.
The substantial construction work required for this type of heating means it's more appropriately installed when a house is being built. We're assuming that you're interested in retrofit solutions, but if you're planning major renovation or construction works then
get in touch and we can talk more about this option.
Summary: Underfloor heating is not a viable option for retrofits.
Stove
It's not gas, but it's definitely not clean! Either way, a wood or solid fuel-fired stove is still an option and therefore we have included it.
Pros
- Wood is available almost everywhere.
- Wood heating can be economical if you have cheap or even free firewood (however, check whether you need a permit to collect firewood from forests and remember there is a cost in the time you spent to gather wood).
Cons
- You need somewhere to store wood in a reasonable quantity.
- If you're buying your firewood, it can cost several hundred dollars (or more) for a winter's worth of good firewood.
- There is ongoing maintenance.
- There is limited control over the temperature.
- A stove can only heat.
- They produce combustion gases and need a flue or chimney, which makes installation expensive.
- Not all the smoke and other combustion products go up the chimney; some will get into the indoor air and can be a serious irritant for people with asthma and other respiratory conditions.
- Tiny particular pollutants are hazardous for your health.
- The smoke from wood fires is a major contributor to outdoor air pollution.
Summary: It's not effective as the only source of heating. The health and environmental impacts rule it out as a way to make the living room cosy. Best avoided.
Energy Freedom Homes does not recommend the use of a stove as a heating source.
Which is the best option for your requirements?
Requirement/scenario
| Portable heaters
| Split systems
| Ducted
| Hydronic
| Underfloor
| Stove
|
Purchasing budget
| Low
| Medium
| High
| High
| High
| Low - Medium
|
Doesn't affect indoor air quality
| ✅
| ✅
| ✅
| ✅
| ✅
|
|
Low running costs
|
| ✅
|
|
| ✅
| ✅*
|
Low environmental impact
| ✅
| ✅
| ✅
| ✅
| ✅
|
|
Provides heat, cooling and dehumidifies
|
| ✅
| ✅
|
|
|
|
*only if the wood is sourced for free. High quality firewood is quite expensive.
In summary
Choosing a replacement heating system is not nearly as complicated as a lot of people make out when you break down the options.
To review, the following are the key decisions in the process and our recommendation.
Decision
| Options
| Recommended
|
When to buy
| Now / later
| Now
|
Energy source
| Electric resistive / heat pump / wood
| Heat pump
|
Heating source
| Portable heater / split system / ducted / hydronic / underfloor / stove
| Split system
|
Hopefully, you're well on the way to selecting a reliable replacement for your gas heating system!
Next steps
Want to get straight to the best solution for your home? Save time and effort by j
oining an Energy Freedom Homes Masterclass and learn to identify your needs, gain expert installation advice, and meet trustworthy tradespeople. Check your Masterclass readiness now!References
1 Riedy, C., Milne, G., Ryan, P., Alviano, P., & Dwyer, S. (2020). Hot water systems. Australian Government: Department of Climate Change, Energy, the and WaterEnvironment. Retrieved 2023, from
https://www.yourhome.gov.au/energy/hot-water-systems